Skip to content
ITR GmbH powered by Zippel
Submit an inquiry
Menu
Closed deburring cell in a production hall: a room-high light-colored enclosure, in front of it on the left a row of control cabinets with operating panels, emergency stop and main switches, on the right a safety fence door with a safety switch, above it the media routing of the hall

The burr sits where no tool can reach.

Single-Robot Cell

In components with branched interiors, the burr does not form on the surface but inside — at the intersections of cross-drilled holes, at channel crossings, at bore exits. A brush or a milling cutter would have to reach in there. That is not possible.

1 · The challenge

Branched inside, not accessible from outside

On top of that: the range of parts changes. A fixture designed for one component no longer fits the next.

Where this problem occurs

Valve blocksHydraulic manifoldsGearbox housingsEngine blocksPump housingsTurbocharger housingsSteering housings

Predominantly aluminum die casting. All seven share the same characteristic: internal channels with cross-drilled holes and bore intersections. It is exactly at the crossing points that the burr forms which cannot be reached from outside.

Which burrs are meant

Drilling burrsCross-drilled hole burrsIntersecting-bore burrsExit burrsMilling burrsCasting flashMetal fines

Four of them sit at or in bores. That is no coincidence, but the core of the task. There is no fixed standard burr type — what counts is the part geometry.

2 · Engineering considerations

Two factors decide before the machine

Before a machine is decided on, the component is assessed.
  • The burr root

    Where the burr starts and how firmly it sits. The problem is not “the burr”, but its root.
  • The accessibility of the deburring location

    Whether a jet can reach it at all. That is the actual limit of the method, not the material.

Added to that are material, part geometry, size and weight, cycle time, residual contamination requirement, workpiece fixture and degree of automation.

The material is rarely the decisive factor. Aluminum, steel, stainless steel, brass, copper, zinc die casting and plastic can all be processed. Whether the method fits is decided by geometry, burr root and accessibility.

If the range of parts changes, that speaks for a movable jet guidance instead of fixed nozzles. If it stays the same, we check the more cost-effective stationary solution — even if that speaks against the more elaborate system.

3 · The machine concept

The robot cell with a single robot — our standard concept

From this trade-off, with changing components and spread-out deburring locations, follows the single-robot cell.
  • 01

    The robot guides the nozzle

    To every deburring location, including cross-drilled holes and internal channels. Standard is KUKA; we use ABB, FANUC and Yaskawa just as well if your factory standard specifies it.
  • 02

    The nozzles are the tool of the method

    We work with standard nozzles — and design and manufacture our own nozzle geometries when the application requires it. That is the difference between method development and system assembly.
  • 03

    The water circuit is closed

    Filtration is part of every system; we integrate more extensive water treatment depending on the project.
  • 04

    Safety technology according to risk assessment

    Safety fences, safety doors, light curtains — we design them according to risk assessment.

Where the concept is extended

  • 01

    Vision system

    Detects position or result.
  • 02

    Tool changer

    Several nozzle tools in one cell, changed during the process. That way every burr location gets the suitable tool instead of one compromise for all.
  • 03

    Barcode and DataMatrix systems

    Component identification, deburring program per part, result per part written back.
  • 04

    Automatic loading

    Depending on the project.
  • 05

    Line integration with further systems

    Depending on the project.
  • 06

    Rotary table

    Depending on the project.

4 · The result — and its verification

Two results are verified

Is the burr gone, and is the part clean? We check both.
Visual inspectionCamera-based inspectionResidual burr inspectionResidual contamination analysisProcess monitoring

Process monitoring is qualitatively something different from the other four: it does not check the individual part but keeps the process within its window — the prerequisite for not having to check every part.

Where the limits are

When another solution fits

  • 01

    Dual-robot cell

    When the cycle time cannot be reached with one robot.
  • 02

    Stationary water jet deburring system

    When always the same component runs in a fixed clamping position and fixed nozzle systems are enough. Then it is more cost-effective.
  • 03

    Rotary indexing water jet deburring system (special solution)

    When setup and clamping time are considerable in relation to the processing time.
  • 04

    Industrial Parts Cleaning

    When there is no burr to remove, but only cleaning to do.

Limits

When water jet deburring is not the right choice

Water jet deburring is not the optimal solution if one of these conditions applies:
  • Defined chamfers or radii are to be produced

    The method removes burrs, it does not replace machining.
  • Very firmly adhering or massive burrs are present

    They have to be eliminated differently, by design or by manufacturing.
  • The deburring location cannot be reached with any suitable nozzle concept

  • The method is not economically viable

    For example at very small production volumes, or when a simpler deburring method is sufficient.
  • Another method meets the requirements better

    Technically or economically.

Tell us early what you have in mind. If another method is the better fit, we will say so.

Questions and answers

Frequently asked questions about the single-robot cell

When do I need a single-robot cell?

When the component is branched inside and not accessible from outside — and when something changes: different components, complex geometries, small to medium production runs. The single-robot cell is our standard concept. We design without a robot when a fixed clamping position and cost-effectiveness speak for it.

Does the robot reach every deburring location?

Every deburring location, including cross-drilled holes and internal channels — that is the reason why a robot guides the nozzle at all and not a fixed nozzle system. Standard is KUKA; we use ABB, FANUC and Yaskawa just as well if your factory standard specifies it.

Applications

Components on which this system design is decided

3 worked-out tasks name the robot deburring cell as a possible concept. What tips the balance in each of them is on its own page.

Each case sets out the design factors, the possible system concepts and the methods in detail — here you only find what it is about.

Hydraulic manifold

The channels are drilled, they intersect several times, and at every bore intersection a burr forms.

Valve block

The burr root sits at the bore intersection of two bores — no tool gets there, not because it would be too big, but because no path leads to it.

Components with heavy burrs

Casting flash and metal fines do not sit on one edge but spread out — and later they come loose by themselves.

None of these cases inevitably leads to the robot deburring cell. Which concept it becomes arises from the interplay of the design factors — the machine type is the result of the system design, not its starting point.

Direct contact

AddressITR GmbH powered by Zippel
Hauptstraße 31
93186 Pettendorf
Pettendorf bei Regensburg
Phone+49 (0) 9409-777 3598
Fax +49 (0) 9409-777 3607