Stationary deburring machine
Cost-effectiveness with identical parts — identical workpieces, fixed clamping position, fixed nozzle systems are enough.

“We can’t get the burr off.”
1 · The challenge
A burr that stays rarely remains a form deviation. It comes loose later and travels to where the component does its work — into oil and hydraulic channels, to valves, into pumps and gearboxes. A detached burr in the channel is therefore not only a deburring problem but a residual contamination problem — the same question that every parts cleaning system has to answer.
Not a list of industries, but a common characteristic: what matters is not the industry the part is installed in, but what it looks like inside — branched channels with cross-drilled holes and bore intersections. What they share is the deburring task, not the shape. Most common are gearbox housings, pump housings, engine blocks and aluminum housings.
Almost always made of aluminum or aluminum die casting — a material that machines easily and breaks out toughly as it does. The material is nevertheless not a limit; it is the focus because the components are made of aluminum, not because the method would be restricted to it.
Four of the seven sit at or in bores. There is no fixed standard burr type — what counts is the part geometry, not the name of the burr.
2 · When it is the right method
This page also tells you the opposite direction. Where the method is not the right choice is set out further down in section 7 — on the same page, not in a footnote. That water jet deburring pays off at high production volumes and not at very small ones is the same consideration from both ends.
3 · One step instead of two
Depending on the component and the process design, water jet deburring makes it possible to carry out deburring and cleaning in one combined manufacturing step. Where the requirements for technical cleanliness are particularly high, a parts cleaning system can be added downstream. We develop both technologies ourselves and design them for the same component.
4 · Which machine concept fits
Cost-effectiveness with identical parts — identical workpieces, fixed clamping position, fixed nozzle systems are enough.
Flexibility — different components, complex geometries, small to medium production runs.
Processing performance — very short cycle times, high production output, parallel processing.
Three concepts, three arguments that do not overlap — which is exactly why the choice is rarely clear-cut. With us the robot solution is the standard; we design without a robot when a fixed clamping position and cost-effectiveness speak for it. That is a reasoned decision, not a budget variant.


Once the concept is set, eight factors determine the system: part geometry, material, burr root, accessibility of the deburring locations, cycle time, residual contamination requirement, workpiece fixture and degree of automation. Burr root and accessibility are the two on which the system design turns: the task is not “the burr”, but where it starts, how firmly it sits — and whether a jet can reach it.
Depending on the project, the pressure range lies roughly between 300 and 1,500 bar; unnecessarily high pressure is avoided. The process medium is designed as well — as a rule water, depending on the requirement with corrosion protection, cleaner or additives. All other values come about in the quotation: there are no data sheets for special-purpose systems.
5 · Typical applications
What tips the scales in a case is on its own page: the design factors, the possible system concepts and the methods in detail.
Deburred by hand, every result is a different one — what works on a test part does not carry a production run.
The burr sits in the internal channel of the gearbox housing — where no mechanical tool can reach.
The channels are drilled, they intersect several times, and at every bore intersection a burr forms.
The burr root sits at the bore intersection of two bores — no tool gets there, not because it would be too big, but because no path leads to it.
Casting flash and metal fines do not sit on one edge but spread out — and later they come loose by themselves.
When deburring a component with a verification requirement, the burr must not only be gone — it must be demonstrable that it is gone.
These six cases, too, are orientation, not a key. Depending on part size, production volume and cycle time, the same burr type can call for a different machine concept — the selection is never made on the basis of a single characteristic.
6 · Special solution
With the rotary indexing principle, loading and unloading run in parallel with processing — the auxiliary time drops out of the cycle. That pays off when setup and clamping time are considerable in relation to the processing time.
7 · Where the method reaches its limits
The first and the third point are the two worth checking before an inquiry. The material is rarely the decisive factor here: aluminum, steel, stainless steel, brass, copper, zinc die casting and plastic can all be processed. Tell us early what you have in mind. If another method is the better fit, we will say so.
8 · What comes next
9 · Where our deburring systems are installed
Already realized
What remains decisive is the component, not the economic sector. The method is not tied to any industry: wherever a component is branched inside and the burr cannot be reached mechanically, we design for it — regardless of the industry it is installed in.
10 · Scope of supply and verification
The scope of supply is defined project-specifically. Depending on the requirement, it comprises the water jet deburring system, filtration, water treatment, drying, automation, documentation, CE conformity and training. Drying is not included as standard — where the component has to move on dry, it is integrated project-specifically.
Questions and answers
Technically responsible for this page: Kersten John — Senior Consultant Technical Cleanliness