Skip to content
ITR GmbH powered by Zippel
Submit an inquiry
Menu
Closed deburring cell in a production hall: a room-high light-colored enclosure, in front of it on the left a row of control cabinets with operating panels, emergency stop and main switches, on the right a safety fence door with a safety switch, above it the media routing of the hall

The processing takes longer than the cycle allows.

Dual-Robot Cell

The component has many deburring locations, they are spread out, and each one takes its time. In total, the processing exceeds the required cycle — not because the process is slow, but because there are many locations.

1 · The challenge

It is not the jet that is too slow — it is too many locations

The question then is not how the jet gets faster, but how the work is spread over more than one pair of hands.

Where this problem occurs

Valve blocks, hydraulic manifolds, gearbox housings, engine blocks, pump housings, turbocharger housings and steering housings — predominantly aluminum die casting. What speaks especially for this concept are components with many spread-out deburring locations in series production: the more locations, the better the work can be divided.

Valve blocksHydraulic manifoldsGearbox housingsEngine blocksPump housingsTurbocharger housingsSteering housings

Which burrs are meant

Drilling burrsCross-drilled hole burrsIntersecting-bore burrsExit burrsMilling burrsCasting flashMetal fines

Four of them sit at or in bores — where mechanical tools cannot reach. There is no fixed standard burr type; what counts is the part geometry.

2 · Engineering considerations

First it is checked where the time is actually lost

That is the decisive step, and it is frequently skipped:
  • 01

    Is it the processing?

    Then a second robot helps.
  • 02

    Is it the setup and clamping?

    Then it does not help — then the auxiliary time has to come out of the cycle, and that is what another concept does.

The second point, just as important: two robots do not automatically mean half the cycle time. How much time is actually gained depends on whether the work on the specific component can be divided sensibly — and whether the robots do not get in each other’s way while doing so. We calculate that before design engineering, not after.

Apart from that, the same factors are assessed as in every deburring task:

Burr rootAccessibility of the deburring locationsMaterialPart geometrySize and weightCycle timeResidual contamination requirementWorkpiece fixtureDegree of automation

The material is rarely the decisive factor. Aluminum, steel, stainless steel, brass, copper, zinc die casting and plastic can all be processed.

3 · The machine concept

The robot cell with two robots

If the calculation shows that the processing time is the bottleneck and the work can be divided, the dual-robot cell follows.

Two robots guide the nozzles — in parallel on the same component or with a divided process, for instance one deburrs while the other handles. Standard is KUKA; we use ABB, FANUC and Yaskawa just as well.

The actual engineering work lies in the division. Which robot takes over which deburring locations, in which order, with which path guidance — and how collisions are ruled out. This division decides the achievable cycle, not the number of robots.

  • 01

    The nozzles

    The tool of the method — standard nozzles as well as our own nozzle geometries when the application requires it.
  • 02

    The water circuit

    Closed. Filtration is part of every system; we integrate more extensive water treatment depending on the project.
  • 03

    Safety technology

    Safety fences, safety doors, light curtains — according to risk assessment. With two robots in one cell it is more extensive than with one.
  • 04

    The workpiece fixture

    Has to give both robots access at the same time — here it is more closely interlocked with the path planning than in a single-robot cell.

Where the concept is extended

  • 01

    Vision system

  • 02

    Tool changer

    Several nozzle tools, changed during the process.
  • 03

    Barcode and DataMatrix systems

    Component identification, program and result per part.
  • 04

    Automatic loading

  • 05

    Line integration with further systems

  • 06

    Rotary table

    Depending on the project.
Automation & Robotics

4 · The result — and its verification

Two results are verified: residual burr and residual contamination

Is the burr gone — and is the part clean? With us, both come from a single source.
Visual inspectionCamera-based inspectionResidual burr inspectionResidual contamination analysisProcess monitoring

With short cycles, process monitoring gains weight: it keeps the process within its window instead of checking every part individually.

Where the limits are

When another solution fits

This is the most important delineation on this page: two robots shorten the processing time. They do not shorten the auxiliary time. Where the auxiliary time is the problem, another concept helps.
  • 01

    Single-robot cell

    When the cycle time can be reached with one robot as well. The second robot is effort that has to pay off.
  • 02

    Stationary water jet deburring system

    When always the same component runs in a fixed clamping position and fixed nozzle systems are enough.
  • 03

    Rotary indexing water jet deburring system (special solution)

    When the bottleneck is not the processing time but setup and clamping.

Where the method reaches its limits

When water jet deburring is not the right choice

Water jet deburring is not the optimal solution if one of these conditions applies:
  • Defined chamfers or radii are to be produced

    The method removes burrs, it does not replace machining.
  • Very firmly adhering or massive burrs are present

    They have to be eliminated differently, by design or by manufacturing.
  • The deburring location cannot be reached with any suitable nozzle concept

  • The method is not economically viable

    For example at very small production volumes, or when a simpler deburring method is sufficient.
  • Another method meets the requirements better

    Technically or economically.

Questions and answers

Frequently asked questions about the dual-robot cell

When is a dual-robot cell worthwhile?

When it is not the jet that is too slow, but too many locations that have to be processed. First it is checked where the time is actually lost — only then is it clear whether a second robot is the right lever. Its argument is processing performance: very short cycle times, high production output, parallel processing.

How do the two robots work together?

Two robots guide the nozzles — in parallel on the same component or with a divided process, for instance one deburrs while the other handles. Which division works follows from the component, the number of deburring locations and the cycle specification. Standard is KUKA; we use ABB, FANUC and Yaskawa just as well.

Applications

Components on which this system design is decided

3 worked-out tasks name the dual-robot deburring cell as a possible concept. What tips the balance in each of them is on its own page.

Each case sets out the design factors, the possible system concepts and the methods in detail — here you only find what it is about.

Hydraulic manifold

The channels are drilled, they intersect several times, and at every bore intersection a burr forms.

Valve block

The burr root sits at the bore intersection of two bores — no tool gets there, not because it would be too big, but because no path leads to it.

Components with heavy burrs

Casting flash and metal fines do not sit on one edge but spread out — and later they come loose by themselves.

None of these cases inevitably leads to the dual-robot deburring cell. Which concept it becomes arises from the interplay of the design factors — the machine type is the result of the system design, not its starting point.

Direct contact

AddressITR GmbH powered by Zippel
Hauptstraße 31
93186 Pettendorf
Pettendorf bei Regensburg
Phone+49 (0) 9409-777 3598
Fax +49 (0) 9409-777 3607