Skip to content
ITR GmbH powered by Zippel
Submit an inquiry
Menu
Media and high-pressure technology of a deburring system: on the left the yellow-painted high-pressure pump with pressure gauges, next to it filter housings, pumps and piping, on the right a process tank with handwheels and the access stairs

High production volume, always the same component — and still it is deburred by hand.

Stationary Water Jet Deburring System

A component runs in series, in a constant version, always with the same deburring locations. The deburring happens manually or in an intermediate step that costs time and whose result depends on the day.

1 · The challenge

The task here is not complexity, but repetition

Nothing changes — and that is exactly why it pays to fix the process instead of guiding it anew every time.

Where this problem occurs

Valve blocksHydraulic manifoldsGearbox housingsEngine blocksPump housingsTurbocharger housingsSteering housings

Predominantly aluminum die casting. For this concept, those among them come into question that run in a constant version and production volume.

Which burrs are meant

Drilling burrsCross-drilled hole burrsIntersecting-bore burrsExit burrsMilling burrsCasting flashMetal fines

Even without a movable jet guidance, the jet reaches burrs at and in bores — the nozzle only has to stand correctly once. There is no fixed standard burr type; what counts is the part geometry.

2 · Engineering considerations

The decisive question is: does anything change?

A robot makes sense when something changes — the component, the position, the deburring locations. If nothing changes, it travels a fixed path that a fixed nozzle system can cover as well. Then the stationary system is the more cost-effective solution, and we tell you so.

What is assessed for this are burr root, accessibility of the deburring locations, material, part geometry, size and weight, cycle time, residual contamination requirement, workpiece fixture and degree of automation.

The material is rarely the decisive factor. Aluminum, steel, stainless steel, brass, copper, zinc die casting and plastic can all be processed.

A trade-off we address openly: this configuration is the most cost-effective as long as the component stays the same — and the least flexible as soon as it changes. If new components are foreseeable, that belongs in the decision, not in the follow-up conversation.

With ITR, the robot solution is the standard. We design without a robot when a fixed clamping position and cost-effectiveness speak for it — that is a reasoned decision, not a saving in the wrong place. The stationary system is a fully fledged standard concept, not a makeshift.

3 · The machine concept

Fixed nozzle systems, designed for one component in one position

From this trade-off, with a constant component, follows the stationary system with fixed nozzle systems.

The nozzles sit where the deburring locations are — designed for this one component in this one position. We work with standard nozzles and design and manufacture our own nozzle geometries when the application requires it.

That shifts the engineering work forward. With the robot cell, the path is programmed and can be adapted later. Here the nozzle arrangement is designed — it has to be right the first time.

The clamping fixture carries more responsibility here than usual. Because the nozzles are fixed, the component has to sit exactly and repeatably in the same position. A deviation that a robot could compensate goes straight into the result here. Standard are pneumatic clamping fixtures.

The water circuit is closed. Filtration is part of every system; we integrate more extensive water treatment depending on the project. Safety technology according to risk assessment.

Where the concept is extended

  • 01

    Barcode and DataMatrix systems

    Component identification and traceability.
  • 02

    Automatic loading

  • 03

    Line integration with further systems

  • 04

    Rotary table

    Depending on the project.

Vision system and tool changer belong to the range of options of the robot cells; whether they can be used sensibly here is a question of the individual case.

4 · The result — and its verification

Two results are verified: residual burr and residual contamination

Is the burr gone — and is the part clean? Both verifications from a single source.
Visual inspectionCamera-based inspectionResidual burr inspectionResidual contamination analysisProcess monitoring

With a fixed process, process monitoring is particularly effective: if nothing is supposed to change, every deviation is a signal.

When another solution fits

Fixed nozzles are designed for one component

A new component means new nozzles. As soon as that changes, another concept is the better fit.
  • 01

    Single-robot cell

    As soon as different components are to run over the system, or the geometries are complex and the deburring locations spread out.
  • 02

    Dual-robot cell

    With very short cycle times and high production output.
  • 03

    Rotary indexing water jet deburring system (special solution)

    When setup and clamping time are considerable in relation to the processing time.

Limits of the method

Water jet deburring is not automatically the best solution

Water jet deburring is not the optimal choice if one of these conditions applies:
  • Defined chamfers or radii are required

    The method removes burrs, it does not replace machining — the jet does not shape the edge.
  • Very firmly adhering or massive burrs

    They have to be eliminated differently, by design or by manufacturing.
  • The deburring location cannot be reached with any nozzle concept

    Whether it can be reached is decided by the geometry, not by the size of the burr.
  • It is not economically viable

    For example at very small production volumes, or when a simpler deburring method is sufficient.
  • Another method meets the requirements better

    Technically or economically.

Scope of supply

The scope of supply is defined project-specifically

Questions and answers

Frequently asked questions about the stationary system

When is a stationary deburring system the right choice?

When nothing changes. A robot makes sense when something changes — the component, the position, the deburring locations. If nothing changes, it travels a fixed path that a fixed nozzle system can cover as well. Then the stationary system is the more cost-effective solution, and we tell you so.

How is a stationary deburring system built?

With fixed nozzle systems, designed for one component in one position. The task here is not complexity, but repetition: the same part, the same clamping position, the same deburring locations — every time. That is exactly where the cost-effectiveness comes from, and that is exactly why no freely programmable path is needed.

Applications

Components on which this system design is decided

3 worked-out tasks name the stationary deburring machine as a possible concept. What tips the balance in each of them is on its own page.

Each case sets out the design factors, the possible system concepts and the methods in detail — here you only find what it is about.

Hydraulic manifold

The channels are drilled, they intersect several times, and at every bore intersection a burr forms.

Valve block

The burr root sits at the bore intersection of two bores — no tool gets there, not because it would be too big, but because no path leads to it.

Components with heavy burrs

Casting flash and metal fines do not sit on one edge but spread out — and later they come loose by themselves.

None of these cases inevitably leads to the stationary deburring machine. Which concept it becomes arises from the interplay of the design factors — the machine type is the result of the system design, not its starting point.

Direct contact

AddressITR GmbH powered by Zippel
Hauptstraße 31
93186 Pettendorf
Pettendorf bei Regensburg
Phone+49 (0) 9409-777 3598
Fax +49 (0) 9409-777 3607